1995 Caterham 21 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Caterham 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Caterham 21 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1995 Caterham 21. (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1995 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Caterham 21. (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Caterham 21.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Caterham 21 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Caterham | Dodge |
Model | 21 | Ram |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1070 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 98 L |