1995 Caterham Super 7 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Caterham Super 7 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Caterham Super 7 (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Caterham Super 7 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 616 kg more than 1995 Caterham Super 7.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Caterham Super 7. (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Caterham Super 7.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Caterham Super 7 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Caterham | Triumph |
Model | Super 7 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 554 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |