1995 Caterham Super 7 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1995 Caterham Super 7 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1995 Caterham Super 7. (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1995 Caterham Super 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 850 kg more than 1995 Caterham Super 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Caterham Super 7 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | Super 7 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 554 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2960 mm |
