1995 Caterham Super 7 vs. 1967 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1995 Caterham Super 7 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Caterham Super 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Caterham Super 7 (138 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Caterham Super 7 should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 426 kg more than 1995 Caterham Super 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Caterham Super 7 (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Caterham Super 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Caterham Super 7 | 1967 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Caterham | Zastava |
Model | Super 7 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 156 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 554 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2430 mm |