1995 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1126 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Astro | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Astro | 102 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1896 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2160 mm |
