1995 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (145 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (230 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Astro | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Astro | 929 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |