1995 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer (196 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 675 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer (349 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Blazer | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Blazer | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4299 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 349 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
