1995 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 4,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer (196 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 164.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Blazer (349 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 164. (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Blazer | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Blazer | 164 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1979 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4299 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1440 mm |