1995 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1968 Mazda Luce
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Luce. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 353 kg more than 1968 Mazda Luce. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Luce. (152 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Camaro | 1968 Mazda Luce | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | Luce |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3391 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |