1995 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1982 Mazda 121
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 303 kg more than 1982 Mazda 121.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Camaro | 1982 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 121 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3391 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2520 mm |