1995 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 118 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Econovan |
Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3391 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2210 mm |