1995 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Daihatsu YRV

To start off, 2003 Daihatsu YRV is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 523 kg more than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Daihatsu YRV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu YRV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. (120 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu YRV.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Chevrolet Camaro 2003 Daihatsu YRV
Make Chevrolet Daihatsu
Model Camaro YRV
Year Released 1995 2003
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3391 cc 1298 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 120 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 72 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 79.7 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1413 kg 890 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 3770 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2360 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14 L/100km 4.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 36 L