1995 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Holden Captiva

To start off, 2006 Holden Captiva is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Captiva (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 2006 Holden Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Captiva (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Holden Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. 2006 Holden Captiva has automatic transmission and 1995 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Holden Captiva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: