1995 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 397 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (152 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Camaro | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3391 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |