1995 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Cavalier | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2190 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 63 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 55 L |
