1995 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 913 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Cavalier | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2190 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 109 L |
