1995 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 725 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Cavalier | Corniche |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2190 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3030 mm |
