1995 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2000 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier (121 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. (103 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 281 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. (130 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Cavalier | 2000 Volkswagen Lupo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Cavalier | Lupo |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 121 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 34 L |