1995 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Corvette (380 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Corvette | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Corvette | Elan |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 380 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |