1995 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1983 Holden Camira
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 5,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 480 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Corvette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Chevrolet Corvette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Corvette (570 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 1995 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Corvette | 1983 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Corvette | Camira |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5727 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |
