1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (160 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 330 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (252 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Monte Carlo | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |
