1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 315 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (292 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Monte Carlo | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |
