1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (292 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (188 Nm). This means 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Monte Carlo | Megane |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2690 mm |