1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 22 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (252 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Monte Carlo | Countryman |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |