1995 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Suburban (187 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Chevrolet Suburban has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Chevrolet Suburban will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Suburban | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Suburban | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5731 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2490 mm |
