1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 166 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Tracker | A6G |
Year Released | 1995 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |