1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 31 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
| Model | Tracker | RM A |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |
