1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
