1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Tracker | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2540 mm |
