1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1962 Ford Popular
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Popular would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1962 Ford Popular. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 536 kg more than 1962 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Popular. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1962 Ford Popular | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | Popular |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2220 mm |
