1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 DAF 600
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 636 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (181 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Tracker | 600 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2060 mm |
