1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 90 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | Tracker | Tiger |
Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2190 mm |