1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Tracker | 2000 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |