1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 360 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tracker | Lancer |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2390 mm |