1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1986 Lada 2105
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1986 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 266 kg more than 1986 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Lada 2105. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1986 Lada 2105 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Tracker | 2105 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2430 mm |