1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 50 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tracker | 626 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 157 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2620 mm |