1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 266 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Tracker | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |
