1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1047 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (181 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Tracker | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 2313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3100 mm |
