1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Renault Clio

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 97 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 200 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.

Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Chevrolet Tracker 2006 Renault Clio
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Tracker Clio
Year Released 1995 2006
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1589 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1230 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2690 mm