1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Ford F-450
To start off, 2008 Ford F-450 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford F-450 (350 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford F-450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-450 (881 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 700 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (181 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | F-450 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 881 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 6670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 4390 mm |