1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2010 Pagani Zonda is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Pagani Zonda (547 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 450 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Pagani Zonda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Pagani Zonda (759 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 620 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pagani |
Model | Tracker | Zonda |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 547 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 759 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1141 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |