1995 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 221 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Tracker | C30 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2639 mm |
