1995 Chrysler Atlantic vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Atlantic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Atlantic would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Atlantic is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Chrysler Atlantic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Chrysler Atlantic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Chrysler Atlantic has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Chrysler Atlantic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Atlantic | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Atlantic | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2490 mm |
