1995 Chrysler Atlantic vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Atlantic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Atlantic would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Chrysler Atlantic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Atlantic | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
| Model | Atlantic | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 459 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2156 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2916 mm |
