1995 Chrysler Cirrus vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus (164 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1970 Ford Falcon. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 33 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Cirrus.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Cirrus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chrysler Cirrus. (221 Nm @ 4350 RPM). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chrysler Cirrus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Cirrus | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Cirrus | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4093 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 326 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 93.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1327 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |
