1995 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,255 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 260 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Concorde | 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Concorde | Silver Dawn |
Year Released | 1995 | 1952 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 4255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3050 mm |