1995 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1964 Volvo PV 544 1.8
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo PV 544 1.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo PV 544 1.8 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 600 kg more than 1964 Volvo PV 544 1.8.
Because 1964 Volvo PV 544 1.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo PV 544 1.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Concorde | 1964 Volvo PV 544 1.8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Concorde | PV 544 1.8 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |