1995 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1286 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2006 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Concorde | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Concorde | F-250 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 4198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3490 mm |