1995 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 505 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2006 Suzuki Reno has manual transmission. 2006 Suzuki Reno will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Concorde | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | Concorde | Reno |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |