1995 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 535 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 2012 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Concorde | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Concorde | Highlander |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4796 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2789 mm |